Thursday, April 28, 2016

29th Annual Liturgy for Deceased Children

29th Annual Liturgy for Those Whose Children Have Died 

Friday May 6, 2016 at 7:30 PM 
Notre Dame RC Church
359 Central Ave., North Caldwell 

All parents who have suffered the death of a child of any age are invited to attend with their families and friends. A personal witness will also be offered as the name of each child is read during the Mass. 

Pre-registration is requested by calling the Family Life Office at 
973-497-4327. 

Safety Groups Urge Government to Recall Ikea Dresser

Three Deaths from falling furniture prompt urgent call for action from Consumer Reports and its partners

Consumer Reports / Daniel DiClerico / April 27, 2016

Following a report last week by the Philadelphia Inquirer that the death of a 22-month-old boy in February was caused by a falling Malm IKEA dresser, Consumer Reports, along with several consumer and child safety groups, is urging the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to secure a formal recall of the IKEA dresser responsible for the tragedy. This is the third confirmed tip-over death from a Malm IKEA dresser.

In a joint letter issued today to CPSC Chairman Elliot Kaye, Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports, along with Kids In Danger, the Consumer Federation of America, and the National Center for Health Research, urged the federal safety agency to take strong, immediate action to better protect children from the tip-over hazard of certain Malm IKEA dressers.

Both IKEA and the CPSC were aware of the safety concerns with this particular furniture line prior to this latest incident. In July 2015, the commission and Sweden-based retailer announced two deaths from tipping IKEA dressers and launched a repair and education campaign for the products. But the warnings stopped short of a recall.

The announcement also didn’t inform consumers that Malm IKEA dressers fail to meet a voluntary safety standard agreed to by the furniture industry (ASTM F2057-14), which requires testing to ensure that each dresser drawer can withstand a 50-pound weight, while open, without the unit tipping over.

While voluntary standards like this one can’t be enforced by the government—unlike mandatory federal safety standards—it is possible that tragedy may have been averted if the IKEA dressers involved in the latest incident complied with the industry standard.

"To learn that a tipping IKEA Malm dresser killed yet another child, when the company and the CPSC chose not to do a recall after the first two deaths, is beyond heartbreaking—it is unacceptable,” writes Consumer Reports, along with its fellow safety advocates. “We recommend a stop sale of the type of furniture that was involved in deaths and that does not meet the ASTM standard, as well as refunds for consumers who want them,” the group added. “For those who want to anchor the furniture, IKEA should develop a program to provide an incentive for consumers to anchor their furniture.”

While a particularly restrictive federal law limits the information that the agency can disclose, CPSC Chairman Elliot Kaye said in response to the safety groups' letter, “I wholeheartedly agree that more needs to done, quickly, to protect innocent children from the hidden hazard of furniture tip-overs. Without commenting on any specific case, companies are on notice that even if there has been a public announcement about a remedy to address a dangerous product, the company must take every possible step to prevent further harm. This is especially the case when a child dies. Companies need to move fast and work with us on a comprehensive plan that offers their customers every necessary measure required for the sake of safety. I expect companies to truly put safety first, period.”

Monday, April 25, 2016

Sleep aids carry an array of risks, including next-day hangover effects



Consumer Reports / April 22, 2016


Sleeplessness is complicated — but that hasn’t stopped millions from craving a simple chemical solution. Potions to ease the misery of insufficient sleep can be traced to the ancient Egyptians, who employed an extract of the opium poppy.

In a Consumer Reports survey, 37 percent of people who complained of sleep problems at least once per week said they had used an over-the-counter or prescription sleep drug in the previous year.

“But those benefits aren’t as great as many people assume, and the drugs have important harms,” says Dr. Lisa Schwartz, a drug-safety expert at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine in Hanover, N.H., who has worked with Consumer Reports Best Buy Drugs on investigating sleeping pills.

What’s more, the survey found that about half of people who take sleep aids use the drugs in potentially harmful ways — by, for example, taking them more often or longer than recommended or combining them with other medications or supplements.

Even taken as directed, sleeping pills pose risks, including next-day drowsiness. A study published online in June 2015 by the American Journal of Public Health found that people prescribed sleeping pills were around twice as likely to be in car crashes as other people. The researchers estimated that people taking sleep drugs were as likely to have a car crash as those driving with a blood alcohol level above the legal limit.

Several sleeping-pill instructions caution users to take the medications only if they can stay in bed for at least seven or eight hours.

And to address the dangers of next-day drowsiness, the Food and Drug Administration has cut in half the recommended doses for Ambien and Lunesta.


The labels for Ambien CR and Belsomra 20 milligrams, in fact, caution against driving at all the day after taking the pill. Yet Consumer Reports’ survey found that about a quarter of sleep-aid users drove with less than seven hours of sleep at least once in the previous year.

Sleeping pills can pose other dangers, too, including dizziness, falls, and fractures.

“These drugs are known to have a hangover effect that impairs coordination and balance into the next day, especially in older adults,” says Dr. Ariel Green, a geriatrician at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.

Even over-the-counter sleep aids — such as Advil PM, Sominex, and ZzzQuil — pose risks, including daytime drowsiness, confusion, constipation, dry mouth, and problems urinating.

Consumer Reports’ medical experts recommend following these precautions, which apply to both prescription and over-the-counter sleep drugs:

■ Tell your doctor about all of the medications you take, including supplements. Many common drugs, such as certain antibiotics and antidepressants, can interact dangerously with sleep drugs.

■ Take the drugs only if you have time for at least seven or eight hours of sleep. Even if you’ve had that much sleep, don’t drive if you feel drowsy.

■ Do not take an extra dose if you wake up in the middle of the night.

■ Never mix sleeping pills with alcohol, recreational drugs, or other sleep drugs or supplements, including over-the-counter nighttime pain relievers and antihistamines, such as Benadryl Allergy, that contain the sedative diphenhydramine.

■ Start with the lowest recommended dose, especially until you know how the drug affects you.

■ Be cautious about frequent use. Taking sleep drugs regularly can breed dependence and raise the risk of adverse effects.

Editor's Note: This article and related materials are made possible by a grant from the state Attorney General Consumer and Prescriber Education Grant Program, which is funded by the multistate settlement of consumer-fraud claims regarding the marketing of the prescription drug Neurontin (gabapentin).

Friday, April 22, 2016

Do prescription drug ads help or hurt consumers seeking relief?


  • To the American Medical Association, the Zoloft egg is one example of a bigger problem they say is having a negative impact on American health care. Calling for a ban of direct-to-consumer drug advertising in November, the AMA accused the ads of driving the demand for often unnecessary, expensive medication.Do prescription drug ads help or hurt consumers seeking relief?

  • By Chandra Johnson
    Deseret News Service

    Posted Apr. 20, 2016 at 12:15 PM 

    Conversationally, doctors refer to it as the Zoloft "sad egg," the small, weirdly cute animated egg cowering under a rain cloud in its cartoonish struggle to regulate its sadness in one of the most iconic prescription drug ads of the early 2000s.
    For pharmaceutical companies, doctors and millions of American prescription patients, it was the face that launched a thousand ads — the beginning of a $4.8 billion advertising business that has since expanded to about 80 direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription ads an hour, according to Nielsen.
    To the American Medical Association, the Zoloft egg is one example of a bigger problem they say is having a negative impact on American health care. Calling for a ban of direct-to-consumer drug advertising in November, the AMA accused the ads of driving the demand for often unnecessary, expensive medication.
    "Direct-to-consumer advertising also inflates demand for new and more expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate," AMA board chairwoman-elect Patrice A. Harris said in the AMA's announcement.
    But to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the ads serve a valuable public service in raising awareness about undertreated conditions and new treatment options.
    "Providing FDA-regulated, scientifically accurate information to patients so that they are better informed about their health care and treatment options is the goal of direct-to-consumer advertising about prescription medicines," PhRMA senior communications director Holly Campbell said in an email. "DTC advertising encourages patients to visit their health care providers' offices for important conversations about health that might otherwise not take place."
    While the call for a ban alone is unlikely to inspire a change to ad guidelines, it could inspire legislation to further restrict what pharmaceutical ads can and cannot include (the Food and Drug Administration declined to comment on ad regulation because of the potential for such legislation). Some doctors don't think that would be a bad thing.
    "DTC ads are effective in that they increase patient/doctor conversations and prescriptions and, probably, the number of patients in genuine need of prescription therapy to get medications," said Dr. Richard Kravitz, University of California Davis professor of internal medicine. "But it also increases the number of unnecessary and harmful prescriptions for patients."
    Others question what an ad ban would mean for Americans who could theoretically go their entire lives with a condition that's easily treated because they simply aren't aware of treatment options.
    "It's really difficult to make a statement about all drug ads because you have the coexistence of under-treatment with some conditions, where advertising could help and overtreatment that can hurt," University of Pittsburgh public health researcher Julie Donohue said. "It's difficult for regulators to set up rules of the game that will address the lack of awareness without exacerbating the overuse problem."

Monday, April 18, 2016

How to Avoid a C-Section Procedure



Consumer Reports/ April 13, 2016
Picked up from Yahoo News


A third of babies born in the U.S. are delivered by cesarean section, and researchers estimate that about half of those surgeries are medically unnecessary.
A number of hospitals have taken steps to reduce the number of C-section procedures. For example, the 30 hospitals across the country that are affiliated with the Kaiser Permanente healthcare system, most of them in California, have an average C-section rate of 22 percent for low-risk deliveries, which is below the national target. Kaiser tends to do well in part because its structure allows it to identify best practices, and then quickly spread them to all of its facilities, says Tracy Flanagan, M.D., a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist and director of women's health with Kaiser. Those practices include staffing the labor and delivery floors with certified nurse-midwives, and establishing standards for how to interpret electronic fetal monitoring.
And lowering C-section rates can take years of hard work, according to Robert Silverman, M.D., chief of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Crouse Hospital in Syracuse, N.Y. His hospital had the lowest C-section rate for low-risk pregnancies in our Ratings among facilities with at least 3,500 births, at just 11 percent. "We have spent literally decades on educating the physicians at our institution about really good prenatal care," Silverman says. "Everything we can do to prevent that first C section from occurring, we try to do."
Since it can take so long time for hospitals to change their approach to childbirth, it may be up to you to reduce your risk of having a C-section procedure. Here are some steps you can take.
1. Find Out Your Hospital’s C-Section Rate
Start with our hospital Ratings. If your hospital is not included, ask the person who will deliver your baby about the hospital’s rates. A hospital’s C-section rate for low-risk deliveries for first-time moms should be below 23.9 percent. If your hospital does not publicly report its data, ask why—and ask what their rate is. If they don't tell you, consider going to another hospital. Note that some hospitals may have low C-section rates because they transfer women at higher risk to other hospitals, so ask the hospital how they handle such patients.
2. Choose Your Provider Carefully
It’s good to know the C-section rates for your doctor, too, so ask whether his or her practice tracks their C-section procedures. “Even if they don’t know the exact percent, providers should be able to articulate their philosophy about supporting vaginal birth,” Caughey said. Also ask how the new guidelines may affect the practice’s approach to labor and delivery. If your provider is unaware of the new standards, or is dismissive of them, you may want to find a different one.
3. Consider a Midwife
Women with low-to-moderate-risk pregnancies can consider using a nurse midwife as a primary care provider. Midwives stay with women throughout labor and do not do surgery, so they only transfer a woman to an obstetrician’s care when C-section is medically necessary or serious complications arise, says Amy Romano, a certified nurse midwife (C.N.M.) who formerly taught midwifery at the Yale School of Nursing and is currently senior vice president of clinical programs for Baby+Company, a network of midwife-led maternity clinics based in North Carolina.
4. Watch Your Weight
If you are overweight, strive to shed excess pounds before becoming pregnant. Overweight and obese women have a much higher risk of having a C-section procedure than normal weight women. And once you’re pregnant, talk with your provider about what is a healthy weight gain for you. Women who are overweight should plan to gain less than those who are not.
5. Stay Fit
Women who take part in structured exercise during pregnancy are less likely to need a C-section procedure, research suggests. Talk to your healthcare provider about appropriate forms of exercise, such as walking, swimming, and aerobic or yoga classes for pregnant women.
6. Don't Rush
Doctors should not try to induce labor unless there’s a good medical reason—for example, if a woman’s membranes rupture (her “water breaks”) and labor doesn’t start on its own or she is a week or more past her due date. Trying to induce labor before a woman’s body is ready can lead to surgical delivery if labor doesn’t progress.

More on Pregnancy and Childbirth

7. Don't Worry Too Much About Big Babies
The possibility of a large baby is frequently used to justify a cesarean delivery, but that’s not warranted, according to the new ACOG/SMFM guidelines. To begin with, methods used to assess the baby’s weight toward the end of the pregnancy are not very accurate. Also, babies typically have to be 11 pounds or larger to justify a cesarean, according to Caughey.
8. Get Support During Labor
Consider hiring a doula, a trained birth assistant who can provide physical and emotional support throughout labor and delivery. Women who have continuous support from someone who is not a friend, family member, or a member of the hospital staff labor for shorter periods and are less likely to need interventions, research shows. Ask your insurer if it will cover doula care.
9. Ignore the Clock
The new guidelines call for allowing more time in each phase of labor and delivery. In general, decisions on whether to intervene should be based on how well mothers and babies are doing, not how much time has passed.
Editor's Note: This report is supported in part by the California HealthCare Foundation, based in Oakland, Calif.

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Please consider donating to Rae's GoFundMe campaign

Rae is my long-time, good friend Joan's great granddaughter. Please, if possible, make a donation to the fund. Any amount will be appreciated and all the funds will be used for Rae's care and education. Thank you in advance for your kindness.



This is my grandniece, Raevyn. What an amazing story she will be able to share one day and I'm asking for everyone's help to ensure she has all of the resources available to her. I made a promise to her the night she was born that I would always be here for her and do all that I can to support her and ensure she has every opportunity available to every person fortunate enough to be born in this amazing world.

Raevyn (Rae) is not my blood but she is my family by any and all accounts. 
Her mother has been in my life since she was a toddler and I love her as much as anyone can love another human being. 

Rae's mom, my niece, is a single parent and has been recently diagnosed with avery aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has been enduring chemotherapy as frequently as every other week.  The chemo is being delivered via a port that was surgically implanted in her head to access the tumor that is wrapped around the sacrum (lower spinal column) which infiltrated the central nervous system and cancerous cells have been found in her brain. There is another port surgically implanted into her chest to deliver the chemo to the rest of her blood stream to hopefully destroy the other masses the size of oranges within her pelvis.

If anyone has seen the effects of chemotherapy on a person, you know its not possible to take care of yourself let alone a toddler who requires constant care.
My niece is unable to work and therefore has no money to pay for daycare for Rae. 

I'm pleading with you all to help me raise enough money to pay child care for up to a year so Rae has a safe place to go during the day to allow my niece to heal and get better for Rae, for her family and for me.

The money would go directly to the facility and any excess would go into a college fund for Rae to be used to further her opportunities later in life and give her a platform to tell the story that is incredibly and uniquely, Rae.

Thank you for reading and please know that anything you are willing to contribute is a huge help and graciously accepted.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

NJ c-section raties



At Hackensack University Medical Center, 42% of first-time mothers with low-risk deliveries had a C-section. This worse than the national target of 23.9% and places Hackensack University Medical Center in CR’s bottom Rating category for avoiding C-sections. 

Read more about Consumer Reports c-section Ratings at http://bddy.me/1XygSdm. Photo by @ICAN

source: Facebook, April 14, 2016

Sign the petition! Stand with Striking Verizon Workers


Subject: Sign the petition! Stand with Striking Verizon Workers
Friend,
I'm standing with striking Verizon workers.
Verizon workers are standing together to make sure the needs of working families are met, instead of standing by as a handful of individuals get richer and richer.
They’re standing together because Verizon has fired, threatened, and intimidated working people at Verizon Wireless who are trying to create a better future for themselves and their families.
They’re standing together because they want to earn a living in their own communities instead of moving away from their homes and families for months at a time. They want good jobs to stay in the United States, not be sent overseas.
They’re standing together to make sure that working people at Verizon can not just make a good living, but have a good life.
Please take action and stand with striking workers. I stand with @Verizon Workers ON STRIKE to protect their future. Sign the Petition: 
Thanks!

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Your biggest c-section risk may be your hospital


Vital info if you are a pregnant woman or someone you love is pregnant. It is not easy to look at some of these statistics for NJ. Remember that choice of provider and place of birth impact birth outcomes.


Consumer Reports finds that the rate of cesarean sections vary from hospital to hospital and state to state
Consumer Reports / By Tara Haelle / Last updated: April 13, 2016

The most common surgery performed in U.S. hospitals isn’t on the heart or back or hips or knees. It’s a C-section. Roughly one of every three babies born in this country, or about 1.3 million children each year, are now delivered by cesarean section.  
While a number of factors can increase the chance of having a C-section—being older or heavier or having diabetes, for example—the biggest risk “may simply be which hospital a mother walks into to deliver her baby,” says Neel Shah, M.D., an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School, who has studied C-section rates in this country and around the world.
A new Consumer Reports investigation of more than 1,200 hospitals across the country supports that. It found that C-section rates for low-risk deliveries among U.S. hospitals vary dramatically, even in the same communities and among similar institutions, and that in most hospitals the rates are above national targets.
In many cases, cesarean sections are absolutely necessary. But often they are not: Researchers estimate that almost half of the C-sections performed in the U.S. are done in situations when babies could be safely delivered vaginally instead. And performing a surgical birth when it isn’t necessary poses avoidable risks to the mother and her child and needlessly raises costs, research shows.
Alarmed by that trend, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM)—the nation’s two leading medical organizations that focus on childbirth—issued recommendations in 2014 aimed at safely reining in unnecessary cesareans.
“No one is saying that C-sections are never necessary, and no woman should feel guilty or somehow bad if they end up needing one,” says Elliott Main, M.D., the medical director of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, a nonprofit organization that works to improve outcomes for mothers and babies in that state. “But mothers shouldn’t be coerced, directly or indirectly, into having a cesarean either, and making C-section rates public can give women the information they need when choosing where to deliver their babies,” he says.
Too Many C-Sections
Consumer Reports’ analysis focuses on first-time mothers-to-be who should be at low risk of needing a cesarean: pregnant women expecting just one child (not twins, triplets, or other multiples) whose babies are delivering at full-term in the proper position, which means coming out head first.
The target C-section rate for those births, set by the Department of Health and Human Services, is 23.9 percent or less. That’s 10 percent less than the rate for such births in 2007, which the government uses as a baseline from which to improve.
But many experts say that the ideal C-section rate for those births is even lower. “Getting under 24 percent for low-risk births is something all hospitals should be able to do, but for those deliveries, hospitals should be aiming even lower,” Main says.
Yet nearly six in 10 of the hospitals we looked at had C-section rates above the national target for low-risk births. That means that 40 percent of hospitals already achieved this goal. “This sends a message that almost all hospitals should be able to achieve this rate,” Main says.
The risk of having a C-section also varied depending on where in the country women lived. In general, rates were higher in the Northeast and South, and lower in the West and Midwest.
Go to www.consumerreports.org for more of the story. Read about high and low rates in your state and what hospitals have to say. 

Verizon workers go on strike amid contract dispute


Support Verizon workers

NEW YORK - Tens of thousands of Verizon landline and cable workers on the East Coast have walked off the job after working without a contract since August.
The strike Wednesday morning involves about 39,000 members of the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers in nine eastern states and Washington, D.C.
About 5,500 workers in New Jersey are striking, according to the State Director of the Communications Workers of America Hetty Rosenstein.
The unions say they're striking because Verizon wants to freeze pensions, make layoffs easier and rely more on contract workers.
A spokesman for Verizon says the company is very disappointed that union leadership has called a strike.
Spokesman Rich Young says Verizon has been trying to work with union leadership for the past few months to come up with a fair contract. He says "unfortunately, they have been unwilling to negotiate in good faith and have now called this job action."
The telecom giant has said there are health care issues that need to be addressed for both retirees and workers as medical costs have grown.
Verizon Communications Inc. says it has trained thousands of non-union employees to fill in during the strike.
The last Verizon strike was in 2011 and lasted for two weeks.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Recent credit card scam...please be aware of it



We thought it would be helpful to make you aware of the below scam which was brought to our attention by our local Management team.  It’s a new one that seems to be fooling people due to the increase in credit card fraud monitoring… If you ever have any questions or concerns regarding these types of matters, please do not hesitate to reach out, we are always made aware whenever your cards are impacted:


“This is a heads up for everyone regarding the latest in Visa fraud.   This one is pretty slick, since they provide YOU with all the information, except the one piece they want.
 
Note, the callers do not ask for your card number; they already have it.
 
This information is worth reading. By understanding how the VISA & Master Card telephone Credit Card Scam works, you'll be better prepared to protect yourself. One of our employees was called on Wednesday from 'VISA', and I was called on Thursday from 'Master Card'.
 
The scam works like this:
 
Person calling says - 'This is (name) and I'm calling from the Security and Fraud Department at VISA. My Badge number is 12460, your card has been flagged for an unusual purchase pattern, and I'm calling to verify. This would be on your VISA card which was issued by (name of bank). Did you purchase an Anti-Telemarketing Device for $497.99 from a marketing company based in Arizona?' When you say 'No', the caller continues with, 'Then we will be issuing a credit to your account. This is a company we have been watching, and the charges range from $297 to $497, just under the $500 purchase pattern that flags most cards. Before your next statement, the credit will be sent to (gives you your address). Is that correct?' You say 'yes'.
 
The caller continues - 'I will be starting a Fraud Investigation. If you have any questions, you should call the 1- 800 number listed on the back of your card (1-800-VISA) and ask for Security. You will need to refer to this Control Number. The caller then gives you a 6 digit number. 'Do you need me to read it again?'
 
Here's the IMPORTANT part on how the scam works - The caller then says, 'I need to verify you are in possession of your card'. He'll ask you to 'turn your card over and look for some numbers'. There are 7 numbers; the first 4 are part of your card number, the last 3 are the Security Numbers that verify you are the possessor of the card. These are the numbers you sometimes use to make Internet purchases to prove you have the card. The caller will ask you to read the last 3 numbers to him. After you tell the caller the 3 numbers, he'll say, 'That is correct, I just needed to verify that the card has not been lost or stolen, and that you still have your card. Do you have any other questions?'
 
After you say no, the caller then thanks you and states, 'Don't hesitate to call back if you do', and hangs up. You actually say very little, and they never ask for or tell you the card number. But after we were called on Wednesday, we called back within 20 minutes to ask a question. We were glad we did! The REAL VISA Security Department told us it was a scam and in the last 15 minutes a new purchase of $497.99 was charged to our card. We made a real fraud report and closed the VISA account. VISA is reissuing us a new number. What the Scammer wants is the 3-digit PIN number on the back of the card. Don't give it to them.  Instead, tell them you'll call VISA or Master Card directly for verification of their conversation.
 
The real VISA told us that they will never ask for anything on the card, as they already know the information, since they issued the card! If you give the Scammer your 3 Digit PIN Number, you think you're receiving a credit.However, by the time you get your statement you'll see charges for purchases you didn't make, and by then it's almost too late and/or more difficult to actually file a fraud report.
 
What makes this more remarkable is that on Thursday, I got a call from a 'Jason Richardson of Master Card' with a word-for-word repeat of the VISA Scam. This time I didn't let him finish. I hung up! We filed a police report, as instructed by VISA. The police said they are taking several of these reports daily! They also urged us to tell everybody we know that this scam is happening. I dealt with a similar situation this morning, with the caller telling me that $3,097 had been charged to my account for plane tickets to Spain, and so on through the above routine.
 
It appears that this is a very active scam, and evidently quite successful...”

Friday, April 8, 2016

What You Don't Know About Your Doctor Could Hurt You

Consumer Reports
Marach 29, 2016
By Rachel Rabkin Peachman

Thousands of doctors across the U.S. are on medical probation for reasons including drug abuse, sexual misconduct, and making careless—sometimes deadly—mistakes. But they're still out there practicing. And good luck figuring out who they are.

The state medical board's report on Leonard Kurian, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Southern California, tells in stark clinical detail what it says happened to several patients in his care. And it's not easy to read.

The report describes the time Kurian surgically removed the wrong ovary from a 37-year-old woman, a mistake the patient only learned about weeks later when, still in pain, she went for more tests. The good ovary was missing, and the cystic one was still inside her.

Kurian's record gets worse from there. The report makes the case of how his errors of medical knowledge, judgment, protocol, and attentiveness contributed to the deaths of two patients. Both were young mothers who had recently given birth to healthy babies.

You might think a doctor with that type of record would be barred from practicing medicine, but that didn't happen in this case.

Thousands of working physicians are currently being disciplined by their respective state medical boards for findings that patients may want to know about–things such as sexual misconduct, their own addiction problems, overprescribing controlled substances, and all sorts of other documented examples of unprofessional or dangerous doctoring.

Changing the System

Here's the problem: Even in a time when vast amounts of information sit at the end of our fingertips, it's still too difficult for consumers to find a doctor's disciplinary record and its causes.


Click on the link to read more
You can find out more about the safety record of your toaster and whether or not it's going to catch on fire than you can find about your physicians.'
—Robert Oshel, former associate director for research and disputes at the National Practitioner Data Bank

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Another reason to adopt and not buy from stores

Just Pups owner Vincent LoSacco defends leaving 67 puppies in van


News 12 NJ / Updated April 6, 2016 5:38 PM
Vincent LoSacco is defending his actions of leaving 67 puppies in a van overnight.
PARAMUS - The owner of several pet shops in New Jersey who is facing over 250 counts of animal cruelty is defending his action of leaving 67 puppies in a van overnight in Paramus.

Just Pups owner Vincent LoSacco showed members of the media a similar van that he says he uses to ship the animals. He is arguing against a Paramus police report that says that the temperature inside the van was 38 degrees when officers found the puppies.

“You have to open that sliding door and let all the cold air rush in and all the hot air rush out,” says LoSacco. “So [the officers] looked in, then they went [into the van], door open, then they took the temperature.”


The police report also stated that the puppies did not have adequate food and water inside the van. LoSacco says that there was enough food and water inside the van when the puppies arrived at the Paramus Just Pups location Sunday night.

LoSacco is facing 267 animal cruelty charges for the poor health conditions of the animals at his Just Pups East Brunswick store. He could face more charges in Paramus.


Blogger's note: He should be left in a cage with 67 strangers in a cold van with minimal food and water and let's see how he likes it!